Login
Username:

Password:


Lost Password?

Register now!
Main Menu
Linux Projects Forum Index
   Users - SN9C1xx
     SN9C201
Register To Post

Threaded | Newest First Previous Topic | Next Topic | Bottom
Poster Thread
YooDa
Posted on: 2007/7/23 0:58
Just popping in
Joined: 2007/1/13
From:
Posts: 4
Re: SN9C201
Bus 005 Device 005: ID 0c45:624f Microdia

works with the new SN9C20x driver, nice work.
The qualiaty is not as good as in windows but it works

thanks a lot.
luca
Posted on: 2007/7/23 2:36
Webmaster
Joined: 2003/1/9
From:
Posts: 172
Re: SN9C201
If you tried the driver with videoview, that's the reason of poor quality. the actual version of videoview only supports JPEG by default, but the driver also exports frames in uncompressed format to the applications. When the uncompressed format is requested by the app the quality is probably the same as in windows.

Here are two screenshots:
uncompressed
compressed JPEG
imachine
Posted on: 2007/7/24 3:53
Just popping in
Joined: 2007/7/15
From:
Posts: 4
Re: SN9C201
Hi,

I'm running ArchLinux with 2.6.21-viper kernel, on x86_64, is there any way you plan on releasing the sources for your drivers? I'd happily test them, not everyone runs ubuntu you know :/

What are the reasons for releasing binary only drivers anyway? Could you please point to some explanation or tell us here the reasons behind not releasing (yet? ;)) the sources for this drivers so everyone who runs a custom kernel or a different distro than ubuntu could use this great piece of work?

Regards and thanks so far for your interest in this,

//m.


EDIT: okay so now I have read the FAQ and it seems you have chose the bastard way and bleed us dry for whatever little penny we got. 200Euro for driver compilation? Are you nuts?

Here, I understand you can recieve some money for the work done, that's understandable totally. But it's already done isn't it? So why not help others? I can understand fair and square that carrying the name on your work etc might not be enough to pay them bills, ofcourse, but then again having your name out there is value at that as well as it would give you a possibility to be seen by companies who're on the look-out for programmers/developers.

Moving right along in that direction, perhaphs you could convince sonix to pay you money for this driver? Enough money to perhaphs make this driver GPL? I doubt they will but then again you never know ;) Perhaphs had you given them the sources or the like, that could work. Nonetheless, it's worth a shot I guess had you not done it yet to contact them and see what they have to say about it. The biggest problem as I know it with opensource drivers is the support, how a new kernel breaks things etc, as it seems it's a long-term project that way. The upside of that is had you made it opensource, I'm pretty sure people out there might help out and pick off of where you might've left of, and perhaphs even improve the work.

I didn't buy a laptop for the camera, but now that it's there and knowing that there is a driver out there only to find out someone decides to support one distro more than another, well, it's just not a great feeling to be honest.

Perhaphs make some more cry about it. I will definetly post a link to this place and this driver on notebookreview forums and other notebook forums (drop me a line if you mind). If it works, people maybe will use it - at that, you might concider building a x86_64 ubuntu version too if that's the only distro you plan on supporting now.

Would kind of suck tho had enough people bought enough copies of it so you'd finally decide eventually oh okay let's make it opensource. I'd _definetly_ feel screwed had I been one of those who paid and saw things run that way.

Otherwise, damnit, how much money do you want for this? 200 is quite a sum as I can see it ;) That's an average months pay for where I come from. Good luck selling that. A supported with other drivers camera is like 10-15 euros, 50-60 at best.

Personally, I would much rather donate money to an open source project of yours rather than pay for your binary. Make it open source and I'm pretty sure money will flow your way anyway; keep it binary only and all you can do is wait for some customer to pay you for whatever time you already wasted.

That's just my drop in the ocean, no means to offend anyone so keep it steady out there;)

Cheers,

//m.
guillefar
Posted on: 2007/7/24 15:05
Just popping in
Joined: 2007/7/22
From:
Posts: 2
Re: SN9C201
It seems that I have an <a href="http://www.masoportunidades.clarin.com/aviso/2803817-webcam-eurocase-iron-increible-1-3-mpx-graba-videos" target="_blank">Euro case webcam</a>. It have the SN9C201 chip, but is not working in my ubuntu.
Three questions:

Is there anything I can do to see what could be happening?
Is my camera is not supported, It will be?
Can I help you in any way?

That would be pretty much all. Thanks!!!


PD. Yes, my english is not very good...
imachine
Posted on: 2008/8/17 23:52
Just popping in
Joined: 2007/7/15
From:
Posts: 4
Re: SN9C201
Hey!

No worries!

Someone already seems to have released a microdia based driver FOR FREE and opensource!

Look for 'microdia' usb driver - you can read more with this link:

http://groups.google.com/group/microdia

Hope this helps! Cheers!

I can only confirm it working on my machine problem-free!
« 1 (2)
Threaded | Newest First Previous Topic | Next Topic | Top

Register To Post
 
Donations
Support Our Site!
Make donations with PayPal!
Donat-o-Meter Stats
May's Goal: $150.00
Due Date: May 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Surplus: $-150.00

Donations